• “Does your mother know you drive like that?”
    You were angry and I was mortified. 
    He was younger than I am now, 
    blonde, in a black leather jacket 
    some student would scavenge for 
    seven bucks at the thrift store 
    ten years later, skid marks and all.

    In my memory, he smirks, or maybe 
    that was you. I like to think of you, 
    still, as the foreteller of men’s stupidity, 
    shaking your head while you speak 
    as if you know the decision is already set. 
    Any support to the opposition is 
    merely a matter of liability. 

    You asked for his name, remember?
    You told him you knew his mother 
    (you didn’t) and she would be so 
    disappointed. The mothers are always so 
    disappointed. He rolled his eyes and 
    it hurt your feelings but I was uncomfortable
    so I rolled mine too. You didn’t notice.

    This is no country for old women. 
    You spoke to the doctors in the 
    same voice you used with your 
    second husband and you spoke
    to your second husband in the 
    same voice you used with the kid 
    on the bike and I didn’t understand.

    Somewhere, a stoplight turns green and 
    a young man on a motorcycle flies away.

  • by Mary Oliver

    When death comes
    like the hungry bear in autumn;
    when death comes and takes all the bright coins from his purse

    to buy me, and snaps the purse shut;
    when death comes
    like the measle-pox;

    when death comes
    like an iceberg between the shoulder blades,

    I want to step through the door full of curiosity, wondering:
    what is it going to be like, that cottage of darkness?

    And therefore I look upon everything
    as a brotherhood and a sisterhood,
    and I look upon time as no more than an idea,
    and I consider eternity as another possibility,

    and I think of each life as a flower, as common
    as a field daisy, and as singular,

    and each name a comfortable music in the mouth,
    tending, as all music does, toward silence,

    and each body a lion of courage, and something
    precious to the earth.

    When it’s over, I want to say: all my life
    I was a bride married to amazement.
    I was the bridegroom, taking the world into my arms.

    When it’s over, I don’t want to wonder
    if I have made of my life something particular, and real.
    I don’t want to find myself sighing and frightened,
    or full of argument.

    I don’t want to end up simply having visited this world.

  • by Adam Ehrlich Sachs

    5/5

    Here is the whimsy I have been looking for! Gretel and the Great War has one of the most unique structures I’ve ever come across. The stories are organized from A to Z, with each story centering on a character whose title corresponds with the story’s letter (A is about the architect, C is about the choreographer, etc.). The way the stories connect with one another—ambiguously, at first, then more and more clearly with every new character that’s introduced—is brilliant. It makes the novel feel more like a puzzle than a book. I feel like I could read this dozens of times and still pick up on new connections and nuances each time. Don’t let the whimsy fool you, though—Sachs uses the structure as a vehicle for exploring themes of abuse, societal upheaval, and fascism. I hope to read one of his other works soon!

  • When she was 14, she learned how to tie her shoes. 

    She was not slow, nor disadvantaged in ability or early childhood education. She had simply never had a need to wear a shoe. From the time she took her first steps, the Librarian’s daughter swept from place to place on socked feet that slid over the floors of the Library halls. When she went outside, she peeled off the socks and went barefoot through the man-made lawn or the bubbling courtyard pond.

    She had never met a fire ant, or a thorny bramble, or a rock with too sharp an edge. She had no need for shoes. 

    At puberty—a bit on the older side but not so much as to be concerning—the time came for the Librarian’s daughter to be given a choice. Like her mother and her mother’s mother before her, she would spend the next twenty-four hours deciding: leave her home for a world she’d never known, or commit her past, present, and future to the Library? 

    The Librarian and her daughter took a private car to the Long Island ferry, which they took to a bus, which brought them to the outskirts of the city, where they hailed a taxi cab and directed it to Central Park. They ate hot dogs and fed bits of the bread to the squirrels. They stretched out on the grass lawn and napped and read, then went to the museum where the Librarian’s daughter watched the faces of thousands of tourists light up at the sight of ancient Roman statuary and paintings that shone like the sun. 

    She loved: the people, the food, the neon lights, the taxi cabs and subway cars.

    She hated: the barking dogs, the blaring sirens, the way strangers’ elbows jostled her in the street. And she was terrified by the sight of the homeless people sleeping on the sidewalks. 

    At the end of their trip, she chose the library. She did not know why, other than that she had no money on her own and no friends, and anyway, she didn’t see any other teenage girls walking around the city by themselves. 

    The Librarian cooked her favorite meals for the next two weeks, which meant she was pleased, although she didn’t say it. The Librarian’s daughter felt that she had made the correct choice. 

    At 16, the Librarian’s daughter was promoted. Her title was raised from “Junior-assistant-in-training” to “Junior Assistant.”  She was allowed to greet visitors independently now, and assist visiting scholars in their research. 

    Like all the women of the Librarian’s line, the Librarian’s daughter had a genetically perfect memory. She had memorized the content of every item in the Library’s catalog by the time she was ten, and she could recite them for visitors at will. This was her favorite part of the job.  

    She met with visitors in private study rooms. Their laptops and phones confiscated by security upon arrival, they took notes on legal pads and drafted manuscripts with pen and paper. An inconvenience, she had been told, and nodded sympathetically, but secretly she believed they preferred it this way. There were no distractions in the Library. The outside world did not exist. There were no friends, no family members, no strangers in need of a chat, or news reports relaying the day’s tragedies.

    Some of the guests required silence, handing the Librarian’s daughter notes with requests rather than communicating with her directly. She pulled their sources, set them gently on the corners of their desks, and slid out of the room. These visitors were a necessary evil. Others, she formed more of a connection with—sometimes, ones that almost resembled something like a friendship. She recommended new avenues for research, brought out related works hidden away on dusty shelves before they thought to ask for them, and even reviewed first drafts for coherency. She liked to imagine that connecting with the guests gave her work, and therefore her life, a deeper purpose. 

    ———

    When the Librarian’s daughter was 22, she met a scholar close to her own age, a young man. This in itself was rare. The Library generally appealed to an older audience—retirees with lifelong projects they had yet to complete, professors on sabbatical from tenureships, Fulbright scholars. 

    The young man was working on his undergraduate thesis, a twenty-five-page paper on the ethics of starting a sustainable commune in the 21st century. He told her he was studying philosophy, like Steve Jobs or Thomas Jefferson. Like Martin Luther King Jr, he said. She was entranced by him. 

    His residency at the Library was set to last for one semester. After the first two weeks, the Librarian’s daughter felt she had adequately learned his moods and interests to predict the fluctuating directions of his research. 

    She devoted a special kind of attention to him and his work, one that she had never given to another visitor and which she knew was not necessary to fulfill her duties. She liked to linger by his desk after delivering a new source, sometimes smiling at him until he looked up and smiled back. 

    Halfway through his stay, he asked her to have dinner with him. Visitors’ meals were always hosted in the Dining Hall, while she ate in the ground-level cafeteria with her mother and the Library staff. 

    She blushed when he asked, something she had never before had reason to do. 

    “I’ll have to ask the Librarian for permission,” she said. 

    The Librarian was visibly disturbed by her request. Her daughter recognized the signs immediately: furrowed eyebrows that wrinkled in the middle, a slightly abnormal downturn to her lips. 

    “Protocol does not address dining circumstances directly, but I must advise against it,” her mother said. 

    “Why?”

    “I have found that fixation on specific visitors inhibits our ability to fulfill our birthright responsibilities.”

    “One dinner won’t interfere with my responsibilities,” the Librarian’s daughter said.

    Her mother scowled. 

    “To the contrary, I think it could benefit the scholar’s research,” she added. 

    “Oh?”

    She nodded. “I believe him to be one of those such scholars who require the opinion and active listening of outside sources in order to further their ideas.” She did not know if she believed what she said to be true. 

    “An extrovert, I suppose,” her mother sighed. 

    She permitted her daughter to attend one singular, independent dinner with the scholar in the Dining Hall. 

    She arrived before him—5 minutes early. She ordered two waters for the table, like she had seen characters do in the movies she memorized as part of their film scholar exchange program with NYU. 

    When the student arrived, he held in his hand a bundle of red carnations. She knew he must have ordered them from the mainland. She was honored. She blushed for a second time. 

    They were served crusted salmon and garlic butter asparagus. He offered to buy a bottle of wine, which she refused. The Protocol did not permit her to consume alcohol. They discussed his travels, the opera singer he listened to on the street in front of a church in Barcelona, a memorial he attended in Berlin, a karaoke bar in Copenhagen. She hung on his every word. She told him, in return, about the microflora that lived in the courtyard pond, the ten-year-long botched renovation that resulted in the uneven flight of stairs tucked away in the Library’s second floor. 

    They remained seated long after their meal had ended, until the Dining Hall servants had cleared their plates and begun to mop the floors. When they finally rose from their places at the table, he took her hand in his and kissed it. 

    “What a fantastic night I’ve had,” he said.

    She responded in kind.

    He asked her to have dinner with him one more time before his departure. Remembering her mother’s insistence on the singularity of this evening, she refused. Instead, she spent entire hours with him in his private study room, talking and laughing and even, on occasion, imagining leaving with him when his residency was set to end in a few short weeks. 

    A few days before he was scheduled to leave, she entered his private study room to find his things gone, and a note upon the desk:

    Thought it would be easier this way. I’m sorry, I’m a coward. I hope you’ll write me and I’ll try to come back as soon as I can. 

    Beneath the sentiment was an address, a unit number for an apartment in the same city she and her mother had visited many years ago. 

    The Librarian’s daughter was devastated but, she hoped, reasonable. She attended to her duties, she worked diligently with the never-ending rotation of visitors in the pursuit of their goals, and she cried to herself only during appropriately scheduled fifteen-minute personal breaks. Romantic interest was not permitted by the Protocol.

    She skipped every meal for three weeks, leaving her room only to work. Someone, her mother or one of the servants, took to leaving meals on a tray outside her room. She felt ashamed, but did not know why. 

    After the third week, she sent a letter to the address. She did not address anything they had discussed, or his sudden departure, or the intensity of his absence. She wrote instead about a new collection of books that the library was slated to acquire in the spring. She told him how when she heard the news she understood that she was meant to be elated, that she should have been thrilled, but she could not summon the feeling. She could not remember feeling anything since he left. 

    Two weeks later, he responded to her letter, and so, something new began. 

    ______

    Imagine: an illicit love affair in opposition to a predetermined destiny of celibacy and academic devotion. Unoriginal, right?

    The student, no longer a student now but instead a celebrated philosopher, returned to the Library for the final time during his first sabbatical as a tenured professor at a prestigious university. He was writing a scientific book on love, he had told her in one of his letters. He had visited only one other time since that first semester all those years ago—for a sponsored university fellowship during his time as a PhD candidate. He had begged her to run away with him and she refused. The Library was the only home she’d ever known. There was no one to replace her if she left, and she could not and would not abandon it.

    They parted on angry terms, but he wrote to her again only six months later.

    As a qualified academic, the philosopher was quieter, more still. He did not kiss her hand when she moved to leave anymore. She had changed, too. She was legally a Librarian— “Librarian Two,” specifically. An unprecedented transfer from another location four years previous had brought Librarian Three. She was less concerned with getting in trouble, less bothered by minor infractions from the Protocol, and less watchful for her mother’s eye, which had itself grown less watchful as the years passed. 

    This new chapter of their connection began with a kiss in the study room, which turned into many long, indistinguishable kisses in the study room, which in turn bled into slightly-just-a-bit-more than kissing in dusty dark corners of rooms no one other than the Librarian’s daughter had entered for several decades. Finally, she invited him to her room, a place no one else other than her mother had ever seen. All of this was explicitly prohibited by the Protocol, of course. She did not care.

    The first month was idyllic, then, the worry seeped in. She began to have nightmares about his departure. She woke weeping with despair from the thought of being alone in the Library again, then felt herself overcome with joy as she remembered he had not yet gone. 

    He felt the change in her mood immediately. Again, he begged her to run away with him. She could not bear the begging, but could not bear to say no, so she said “Maybe.” And every time he asked, and every time she said “Maybe,” she felt herself believe it a bit more. Maybe she would leave. Maybe she would marry him and maybe she would get a job in that beautiful strange city and maybe she would do a great number of other things the Protocol had forbidden her from doing. Maybe she would live. 

    In the end, after perhaps the fiftieth or the sixtieth time the philosopher asked, she decided to say “Yes.”

    The philosopher urged her not to tell her mother, and she obliged. It was for the best, she decided. She believed this wholeheartedly, until the night before they were set to depart, when anxiety and grief overtook her and she rushed to the Librarian’s private wing and beat her fist against her mother’s bedroom door. The Librarian answered in her nightgown. 

    “Mother, I am leaving. I wanted to tell you in person.” she said.

    Her mother laughed. “What are you talking about?” she asked. 

    “Do you remember that student who visited when I was in my twenties? The one I broke Protocol to have dinner with?”

    “Vaguely, yes.”

    “He’s here, and I’m leaving with him. I believe I’ve sufficiently fulfilled my responsibility to the Library.”

    “Oh darling,” her mother said. “No.”

    “I know you won’t be pleased—I expected that. But you won’t stop me”

    “No, I know. I would let you go if you could. But you can’t leave. You literally can’t leave.”

    “Of course I can.”

    “You cannot.”

    “What do you mean?” the Librarian’s daughter asked.

    “You made your choice the day we went to the city, when you were fourteen,” her mother said. “Remember the oath you swore? To commit to the Library forever?”

    “Oaths can be broken,” her daughter said. 

    “Sometimes,” the Librarian replied. “Not this one.”

    The Librarian’s daughter was speechless for the first and only time in her life. “I can’t believe you would let me go like this, trying to manipulate me.” She turned and rushed away before the tears could fall.

    “If you go, you will never be able to come back,” her mother called after her. 

    ———

    On the day they were intended to leave, the Librarian’s daughter rose before the sun only to find the philosopher had already gone. While she was confessing to her mother, he was boarding the hired boat she believed to be picking the two of them up at dawn. On his bed was a single note with her name on it and a copy of his completed manuscript.

    The note reads: 

    I know what I have done is unforgivable, but here I am asking you to forgive me anyway. I hope you understand that I did it for the sake of the research. The entire world has learned so much from you and we thank you for your contribution. All the same, I am sorry. 

    The Librarian’s daughter tossed the note aside and began to read aloud: “Love in the Time of Artificial Intelligence: Surveying the Ability of Inhabitant A.I. to Experience Romantic Love and Grief.”

  • by Emily Jungmin Yoon

    First, there was the horse.

    Imagine creatures as majestic,
    standing. All their lives they stand, withholding.

    Imagine being tamed. Learning to be still,
    to be speed. Imagine birds as large

    as horses. We would be flying, grabbing
    a majestic creature by its collar.

    In cylinders of metal, we are four-legged
    beast-lives of liminal spaces.

    One time I was so tired of flying I wondered
    if I will spend all my life packing then unpacking.

    A complaint of privilege. We are such spending
    creatures. And when I say we are beasts,

    is that a metaphor? Metaphor, according to Papastergiadis,
    is also transportation, between absence and presence,

    “articulating action.” Its “very process,”
    in times of extremity, is “akin to prophecy.”

    I like the idea of transportation
    as articulation, that the end of metaphor is a kind

    of arrival, like getting off the train at an unknown stop.

    So when I say we are beasts, perhaps what I mean
    to do is remember that predators

    have forward-facing eyes, and we do
    grab others by the collar, and we do fly

    in metal, in preparation for the kill.

    What I want to do is slow down time.

    Imagine love as a horse.

    Think about us—a distance
    apart only a flying thing could connect us—

    standing and pacing, tamed and watching,

    then finally with each other, laughing
    as if to collapse, unbridled as wild horses.

    In this era of brevity in this era of metal in this
    era of abbreviation, yes, I’m trying to make you

    think of me longer. Yes, this whole time,

    the bird, the train, the whole thing
    about metaphor, I said to say this,

    that this is what carries us, the slow
    consideration of what each other is, can be.

    And first, there was the horse.

  • by Dean Spade

    4/5

    I haven’t read books in the self-help genre in a long time, and to be honest, I’m not sure I would have picked this one up in the first place if I’d realized that’s how it was classified. Love in a F*cked Up World addresses the flaws within the self-help genre head-on, specifically calling out the damage that’s been done by the self-help books in regards to relationships and sex. 

    The subtitle and back cover description are ambiguous to the point of being misleading, and, shockingly, I actually like that. Whether intentional or not, focusing the book’s description on activism and community building tricks readers into doing the type of internal and interpersonal work that can allow those movements to thrive. It offers an accessible basic survey of therapeutic interventions and strategies for developing secure and well-rounded relationships of all kinds. I found it to be well-organized with an appropriate amount of activities and exercises mixed into the bulk of the reading. 

    Hard to give a comprehensive review because I think whether or not this book is helpful will be extremely individualized. Personally, I found that some sections that were helpful to me and gave me a framework for thinking about my interpersonal connections with others, while other sections were much less helpful, either because they’re not issues I struggle with, or because they are repetitions of issues I have already tackled to a deeper extent on my own or in therapy. 

    In spite of how much I liked this book, I most likely would not recommend it (at least not without some kind of disclaimer) due to the unfortunate abundance of editorial errors and discrepancies. One chapter had the incorrect header for over forty pages, and there were several internal citations that pointed the reader to the wrong page. I also noticed several instances of extraneous or missing words. I know these issues are essentially cosmetic, but even so, they distract from the seriousness of the topics being discussed and make me question whether this publishing company is one I can trust.

  • by Richard Siken

    A man walks into a bar and says:
                                                    Take my wifeplease.
                                                                                        So you do.
                You take her out into the rain and you fall in love with her
                                                    and she leaves you and you’re desolate.
    You’re on your back in your undershirt, a broken man
                            on an ugly bedspread, staring at the water stains
                                                                                                    on the ceiling.
                      And you can hear the man in the apartment above you
                                        taking off his shoes.
    You hear the first boot hit the floor and you’re looking up,
                                                                                        you’re waiting
                because you thought it would follow, you thought there would be
                            some logic, perhaps, something to pull it all together
                      but here we are in the weeds again,
                                                                                             here we are
    in the bowels of the thing: your world doesn’t make sense.
                            And then the second boot falls.
                                                                And then a third, a fourth, a fifth.
                A man walks into a bar and says:
                                                    Take my wife–please.
                                                                            But you take him instead.
    You take him home, and you make him a cheese sandwich,
                and you try to get his shoes off, but he kicks you
                                                                                  and he keeps kicking you.
                You swallow a bottle of sleeping pills but they don’t work.
                            Boots continue to fall to the floor
                                                                            in the apartment above you.
    You go to work the next day pretending nothing happened.
                Your co-workers ask
                                        if everything’s okay and you tell them
                                                                                        you’re just tired.
                And you’re trying to smile. And they’re trying to smile.
    A man walks into a bar, you this time, and says:
                                        Make it a double.
                A man walks into a bar, you this time, and says:
                                                                                     Walk a mile in my shoes.
    A man walks into a convenience store, still you, saying:
                                        I only wanted something simple, something generic…
                But the clerk tells you to buy something or get out.
    A man takes his sadness down to the river and throws it in the river
                            but then he’s still left
    with the river. A man takes his sadness and throws it away
                                                          but then he’s still left with his hands.

  • by Kelly Link

    3/5

    I read The Book of Love at the recommendation of a friend, and although my review leans towards the more negative side, I’m still glad I did. The novel’s plot is incredible—three teenagers come back from the dead under mysterious circumstances (after an even more mysterious disappearance) and are tasked with completing a series of challenges to remain in the mortal world. 

    What I liked: I’m a huge fan of magical realism, and this story revolved around a fascinating premise. It has its own universe with its own lore, and I loved piecing together the details. 

    What I disliked:

    Characters: I’m usually a fan of a large cast of characters (see my review of Cloud Cuckoo Land from two weeks ago), but the array of characters in The Book of Love didn’t work for me. I found myself being drawn more to the side characters, Ruth, than to the primary characters like Laura and Daniel. 

    By the end of the story, I didn’t feel like I had any better understanding of the characters’ motivations and personalities than I did at the beginning. Laura, Daniel, Susannah, and Mo undergo incredible transformations in this book—aside from literally coming back from the dead, they learn how to practice magic, meet otherworldly immortal beings, lose loved ones, transform into animals, have memories wiped and replaced, and much more. And yet, somehow, they remain pretty much the same from beginning to end. If this had been a much shorter novel, the absence of these character dynamics and growth would have made more sense to me and could have even added to the magical intrigue of the story, but for a book of 600 pages the absence of character development was stark and disappointing. 

    Pacing: related to the length, I generally felt like the pacing was stilted and inconsistent. The first half of the book dragged on in a way that would have made me consider abandoning it if it hadn’t been a recommendation. Some of the background information was important, yes, but overall, there was just too much of everything to sustain my interest throughout the whole novel. By the second half, the pace picked up, but by that point, I felt so tired of trying to follow the story for no narrative reward that it was difficult to reinstate my interest. 

    Title: I don’t know a kinder way to say it—the title was a terrible choice. It does not connect to anything in the novel until the last few pages, not even in the broadest metaphorical sense, and even then, it’s an extremely loose and random connection. From a bookseller’s perspective, the title also makes it difficult to hand-sell this book even for readers who might genuinely like it, as it comes across like it’s going to fall in the romantasy or self-help genres. 

  • by June Jordan

    Into the topaz the crystalline signals
    of Manhattan
    the nightplane lowers my body
    scintillate with longing to lie positive
    beside
    the electric waters of your flesh
    and
    I will never tell you the meaning of this poem:
    Just say, “She wrote it and I recognize
    the reference.” Please
    let it go at that. Although
    it is all the willingness you lend
    the world
    as when you picked it up
    the garbage scattering the cool
    formalities of Madison Avenue
    after midnight (where we walked
    for miles as though we knew the woods
    well enough to ignore the darkness)
    although it is all the willingness you lend
    the world
    that makes me want
    to clean up everything
    in sight
    (myself included)

    for your possible
    discovery

  • by Emily Henry

    1/5

    Let me preface by saying this: I am not usually a romance reader. I’ll read them occassionally, especially if recommended by a friend, but it’s not a genre I seek out on my own. That being said, while I was impressed with the non-romantic subplot of Great Big Beautiful Life, I thought the romance was incredibly underwhelming. This is the first book I’ve read by Emily Henry, and unfortunately, I did not find that her writing lived up to the hype.

    If I have to read one more sentence about knees knocking together under the table, I am going to lose my mind. Tall, yes, we get it, they’re both oh so very tall! I do not care! “Tall” is the only personality trait that either of them seems to have at all. The main character, Alice, is whiny, meek, and all-around rather annoying. The love interest Hayden is so obnoxiously inconsistent in his behavior and personality that I’m not sure how any woman would be attracted to him at all–sometimes he loves Alice so much that he can’t bear to risk breaking her heart (while deciding on her behalf what would break her heart and what wouldn’t) and other times he’s a straight-up asshole towards her. If the story had been presented as literary fiction focused on the two writers’ experiences with Margaret Ives, I would have been much more inclined to enjoy it. As it is, I would not recommend Great Big Beautiful Life, and I most likely will not read other books by Emily Henry.